|

Rather paradoxical is how some writers twist plain
Scripture to say just the opposite of what was intended. This is the case
with the 11th chapter of Paul's first letter to the Assembly at Corinth,
where female worshipers are told to wear a veil and men are admonished to
be bareheaded.
Yet, some use this and other passages to say that a
man should wear a covering on his head much like Orthodox and Conservative
Jews do in synagogues.
We know that Jews will not allow anyone to come into
the synagogue unless wearing a skullcap known as a
yarmulke or
kepah (beanie). Today at
Israel’s holy places or shrines, including the Wailing Wall, all visiting
males must wear coverings on their heads. So pervasive is this practice
that attendants will place a small paper cap on any visitor's uncovered
head.
Many Scriptures cited as proof that men should wear a
covering on their heads simply do not bear up under even a little
scrutiny. We will examine the remarks of at least one author and show the
error of his conclusions.
High Priests
and Mourning
Given as an example that King David wore a yarmulke in
worship is 2Samuel 15:30: “And David went up by the ascent of Mount
Olivet, and wept as he went up, and had his head covered, and he went
barefoot; and all the people that was with him covered every man his head,
and they went up, weeping as they went up.” This allegedly proves that he
always worshiped Yahweh with his head covered.
In the context of the verse, however, we learn that
King David is in the midst of an upheaval, with his son Absalom trying to
usurp his father's throne. Note verse 31, “And one told David, ‘Ahithophel
is among the conspirators with Absalom.’ And David said, ‘O Yahweh, I pray
You, turn the counsel of Ahithophel into foolishness.’”
Now notice verse 32, “And it came to pass that when
David was come to the top of the mount, where he worshiped Elohim, behold,
Hushai the Archite came to meet him with his coat rent, and earth upon his
head.” Hushai is expressing severe contrition, tearing his coat and
throwing dirt upon his head. This corroborates the statement that David
was in severe distress and shame because of Ahithophel's treachery.
Jeremiah 14:4 gives another example of shame and
contrition leading to wearing a covering, “Because of the ground which is
cracked, since there is no rain upon the land, the farmers are ashamed,
they cover their heads.”
Going barefoot is also a sign of mourning. Because
David was grieving and in shame he covered his head and went barefoot—not
a normal worship practice.
The high priest wore a mitre, and his assistants were
also to wear a headdress while doing Yahweh’s service, Exodus 28:39-41.
Verses 39-4 instruct the making of the coat of fine linen, the mitre of
fine linen, and the girdle of needlework. Aaron's sons were also to have
coats and girdles and bonnets for glory and beauty.
Some scholars say that the anointing of Aaron’s sons
was not necessarily to have them officiate at that time but to prepare
them to take over whenever Aaron was unable to continue his office as the
high priest. We, however, are not high priests—Yahshua is. Were He a
Levite He might wear the mitre in heaven. His priesthood is of the
Melchisedek order as we are, not of the Levitical, Hebrews 5:6.
Proponents of head coverings for men maintained that
men were not to remove their covering even for the dead. They cite
Leviticus 10:6, where Moses commanded Aaron and the priests not to uncover
their heads after Yahweh had destroyed Aaron two sons for burning
unauthorized fire on the altar. The reason was that these two sons, Nadab
and Abihu, were negligent in their duties as priests.
Verse 6 reads: “And Moses said unto Aaron, and unto
Eleazar and unto Ithamar, his sons, ‘Uncover not your heads, neither rend
your clothes; lest you die, and lest wrath come upon all the people: But
let your brethren, the whole house of Israel, bewail the burning which
Yahweh has kindled.’”
Interestingly, the NIV reads, “Do not let your hair
become unkept,” instead of “uncover not your heads.” Here is an extreme
event of mourning and disgrace for the Aaronic priesthood. Furthermore,
the priestly headgear is not the same as the
yarmulke.
Wisdom Like a
Crown
Proponents have tried to equate the
yarmulke with an ornament of
grace in Proverbs 1:9. The pericope must begin at verse 7, “The fear of
Yahweh is the beginning of knowledge but fools despise wisdom and
instruction. My son hear the instruction of your father and forsake not
the law of your mother. For they shall be an ornament of grace unto your
head and chains about your neck.”
This has nothing to do with the
yarmulke being an ornament of
grace. Grace here is unmerited kindness from Yahweh that comes with
following the instructions of the father and advice by the mother. An
ornament of grace adorns the individual who submits to Yahweh. It is not a
command to wear the yarmulke or the headdress, neither is it an admonition
to wear chains around the neck.
Proverbs 4:7-9 is quoted to imply that wisdom is
compared to a head-dress or yarmulke. “Wisdom is the principal thing;
therefore get wisdom: and with all your getting, get understanding. Exalt
her, and she will promote you: she shall bring you to honor, when you do
embrace her. She shall give to your head an ornament of grace: a crown of
glory shall she deliver to you.”
Again, the meaning and sense of this verse is simply
enlightenment, giving us honor like a beautiful crown upon our heads.
Verse 10 goes
on to say, “My son listen to me and do as I say and you will have a long,
good life.” (Living Bible) This
has nothing to do with the kepah
or the yarmulke. It simply
shows that a crown of life will be given to those who overcome and keep
Yahweh’s words.
One writer says, “Isaiah likens Zion to the
kepah, as a crown of glory and
a royal diadem,” and he cites Isaiah 62:3. The meaning, however, is not
that wearing a yarmulke will
give us a crown of glory, but rather that He will hold us aloft in His
hands for all to see as a splendid crown for the King of Kings. It is the
reward that Yahshua gets for His people whom He has helped to overcome and
who have become kings and priests in the Kingdom. Wearing a
yarmulke has nothing to do with
this honor. It is not a badge or uniform. It is poetic language extolling
obedience to Yahweh.
Of Women's
Attire
“It is called a garment of praise in Isaiah 61:3,”
says one writer. “The Hebrew word here translated garment is
maateh and means a head
covering as used in Isaiah 3:20 and Ezekiel 44:18.” Actually, the word
maateh is Strong's Concordance
No. 4594 and is translated vestment. Brown, Driver, Briggs Gesenius
translates maateh as “wrap,
mantle.” And in Isaiah 61:3 as a mantle of praise in the figurative sense.
It does not mean head covering.
The writer, however, maintains, “It means ‘a head
covering’ as used in Isaiah 3:20.” Isaiah 3:20 reads: “The bonnet, the
ornaments of the legs, and the headbands and the tablets and the
earrings.”
There are two words that the writer may have been
referring to. The word bonnet is No. 6287,
peer in Hebrew, a fancy
headdress. The other is headband, No. 7196 (qishur)
or girdle.
Just why the author would bring in Isaiah 3:20 is
difficult to comprehend. If we merely get the context, verses 16 and 17,
we learn that Yahweh is speaking here about the dress of women. It has
nothing to do with men wearing head coverings.
In seeking any verse that mentions head covering,
these yarmulke proponents have seized on verses pertaining to women's
attire and compounded their error.
Some yarmulke advocates attempt to gain support from
Ezekiel 44: 18, which reads, “They shall have linen bonnets upon their
heads and they shall have linen breeches upon their loins. They shall not
gird themselves with anything that causes sweat.”
Verse 15 shows that this refers to priests, the sons
of Zadok. As we have noted before, the priests of the Levitical order were
to wear something on their heads when they officiated in worship. One
wonders, however, how one can confuse the dress of women in Isaiah 3:20
with the priests in Ezekiel 44: 18, while building a case for the man's
yarmulke.
Appeals have also been made to Isaiah 61:10, which
reads, “I will greatly rejoice in Yahweh, my soul shall be joyful in my
Elohim; for He has clothed me with the garments of salvation, he has
covered me with the robe of righteousness, as a bridegroom decks himself
with ornaments and the bride adorns herself with jewels.”
Nothing to
Rejoice In
One author says, “Ezekiel was commanded by Yahweh to
wear the tire (Hebrew peer)
upon his head and to command the children of Israel to do the same.
Ezekiel 24: 17 and 23.” It is important that we note verse 16 of Ezekiel
24, which speaks about the death of Ezekiel's wife. Verse 16 reads,
“Son of man, behold, I take away from you the desire
of your eyes with a stroke: yet neither shall you mourn nor weep, neither
shall your tears run down.” And verse 17 continues, “Forbear to cry, make
no mourning for the dead, bind the tire of your head upon you and put your
shoes upon your feet, and cover not your lips, and eat not the bread of
men.”
It is quite obvious here that the man is not to mourn
and not take off his “tire” (Hebrew
peer, meaning a turban or fancy headdress). Ezekiel is to wear the
headdress and not go barefoot as did King David when he was mourning. He
was to put shoes upon his feet and he was not to cover his lips nor eat
the bread of men. Again this has to do with mourning and has nothing to do
with worship.
Notice verse 23, which reads, “And your tires (fancy
headdress, turban) shall be upon your heads and your shoes upon your feet:
and you shall not mourn nor weep but you shall pine away for your
iniquities and mourn one toward another.” Yahweh is telling Israel that He
will take away their strength and joy of their glory. The desire of their
eyes and the things that they revel in will be removed because judgment is
coming. It has nothing to do with wearing a
kepah to worship Yahweh.
They Went
Wearing Street Hats
The writer notes, “King Nebuchadnezzar made an image
of gold and commanded all to bow down and worship it. But there were three
Jews in his kingdom who would not worship the image, they worshiped only
Yahweh. So the king had them thrown down into a fiery furnace. They went
to this fire trusting in Yahweh with their caps on their heads, Daniel 3:
1, 21. And I believe they were praying all the way. “
Interestingly, the word “hat” referred to in Daniel
3:21 is from the Hebrew karbela
(No. 3737 in Strong's). It appears only in this verse and is translated
hat. It involves casual clothing thrown on like a mantle; the akkadian
cognate is cap. It has nothing to do with worship either in the synagogue
or in the temple. It is an article of street clothing, a mantle type of
cap or turban, according to the
Theological Wordbook of the Old
Testament.
Covering in
the New Testament
One writer asks, “We are told by Paul to pray without
ceasing, 1 Thessalonians 5: 17. Let us suppose that a man is working in
the oilfields where he has to wear a hardhat on his head and work about 10
hours a day. Would it be a sin to pray while working? The way most people
explain 1Corinthians 11, it would be. Let us understand and get back to
the old paths, which are the good ways.”
The writer answers his own question. If we understand
the verse to mean that a man is literally to pray without ceasing, he
would not be working out in the oil fields while praying. Correctly
understood, Paul tells us we should be in an attitude of prayerful
reverence and close communion with Yahweh at all times. It does not mean
that men should forever be on their knees praying with a
yarmulke on their heads.
Next this writer notes, “In 1Corinthians 11, Paul
explains the headdress of men and women in praying or prophesying, As this
article concerns men, we will not go into the women part of it. ‘But I
would have you know, that the head of every man is the Messiah; and the
head of the woman is the man; and the head of the Messiah is Yahweh,’
1Corinthians 11:3. We have three heads mentioned here: the head of man
(Messiah), the head of woman (man), the head of Messiah (Yahweh).
Let us take up the next verse now. ‘Every man praying
or prophesying, having his head (Messiah) covered dishonors his head
(Messiah).’ We pray in the Name of our Head, which is the Messiah. If for
any reason we do not do this, we are covering our head (Messiah) and
dishonoring Him.”
Notice how the author makes his own judgments. He
says, “Whenever we do not pray in the Name of the Messiah we are covering
Him.” The Scripture nowhere says that whenever we do not pray in the Name
of Yahshua we are “covering Him,” It simply is not a scriptural idea. It
is a man-made notion for a man-made doctrine.
Let us continue, “In Paul's day there were people who
would try to hide the fact that they were believers in Yahshua if they
were around Jews who did not believe in Him. Thus, they covered the fact
that they believed in Him, and this dishonored Him, their Head. This is
not talking about the head on your shoulders but the head Messiah and we
are not to cover that head when we pray. We are to pray in His Name
showing all that He is our head,”
Obviously the man is trying to build a case by
inserting his own thoughts and projecting certain concepts into his
private interpretation, making Yahweh's Word of no effect. He attempts to
make us believe that any time we pray to Yahweh and do not petition in the
Name of His Son Yahshua the Messiah we are covering our head, meaning the
Messiah. He gives no Scripture to support this assertion that we “cover
the Messiah” by not praying in His Name.
He goes on, “Now let us look at the next verse. ‘But
every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her
head (man) for that is even all one as if she were shaven,’ 1Corinthians
11:5. So, Paul is saying that a man should have a covering on his physical
head, the head on his shoulders [as well as] when the woman prays or
prophesies or he is causing her to dishonor him (her head).”
Covered By
Proxy?
Can you just hear the twisting of Scripture? He says
that if the woman is praying, then the MAN must have a covering on his
head or she is dishonoring the husband! This is not the meaning of the
verse at all, but is a gross perversion of Scripture. If the woman prays
with nothing on her head, how does the man's head covering prevent her
from dishonoring him?
“If a man does not have a physical headcovering, it is
the same as if his wife had her head shaved.” Obviously then a man would
not have to have on any headcovering if his wife were not in attendance
either at the synagogue or at the meeting worshiping Yahweh. So long as
the man is alone he would not need a covering of any kind, according to
this writer's reasoning. If the wife is praying (according to this
perverted interpretation) and the HUSBAND does not cover his head, then it
is as if SHE had shaved her head!
Paul says differently. He says that if the woman does
not cover her own head (the head on her shoulders) it is as if she were
shaven, which the NIV correctly says is a sign of a disgraceful act. The
man's head covering has nothing to do with the woman's head being shaved.
It is her own head that is to be covered.
He continues, “And only women caught in adultery had
their heads shaved. This has always been a custom among the Jews even
today, for women caught in adultery, to shave their heads. Paul also shows
this in verse 6 that the woman is to cover her physical head also. Man and
woman both are to have a headdress on when they worship Yahweh. This shows
that neither one is without each other in Yahweh, 1Corinthians 11: 11-12.”
The above conclusion of the writer totally misses the
basic thrust of Paul's letter to the Corinthians. Paul is clearly teaching
that if the woman does not have a covering on her head she is less than
pious. The context of 1Corinthians 11: 11-12 simply means that the man is
not without the woman because all men are born from women. But woman was
formed from man’s rib. Yet, both man and woman are from Yahweh Who is the
Creator of all life.
Man's Own
Rules and Traditions
From his book,
What Is a Jew, Rabbi Morris
N. Kertzer states in the section, “Do All Jews Wear Hats When They Pray?”:
“There is a tendency by all faiths to exalt customs into firmly
established religious principle.”
Leaders in Judaism themselves admit there is nothing
in the Bible that teaches men to wear anything on their heads or even wear
a prayer shawl.
"We know from
archeological remains that in ancient days, the people of Israel were often bareheaded. In the
British
Museum , I saw a bas-relief
of the Assyrian king, Sennacherib, portraying Jews who wore no headgear.
The modern Orthodox practice, therefore, of keeping the head covered at
all times does not go back to ancient Palestine . However, in the East the privileged
classes wore some head ornament as a sign of their status and in time this
custom spread to all groups."
(What Is a Jew? Rabbi Mossis N. Kertzer, p. 93)
Professor Jacob Z. Lauterbach has pointed out, “The
custom of praying bareheaded or with covered head is not at all a question
of law. It is merely a matter of social propriety and decorum.” This is
true as far as the Old Testament is concerned. The Apostle Paul makes it
plain that in the New Testament men are to have nothing on their heads in
worship, and women are to have their heads covered.
by
Donald R. Mansager

Online Studies |
Q&A |
Search |
Free
Literature |
Free DVDs
| Home
Copyright © 1999-2009 | Yahweh's
Restoration Ministry. All rights reserved.
|